Microsoft Knowledge Base Email Alertz

KBAlertz.com: (251136) - #Deleted entries are seen when Oracle linked tables containing number datatypes are opened using either Access 97 SR2 or Access 2000. This behavior is seen with both Oracle 7.3.4 server as well as Oracle 8.0.5 server irrespective of the version of the...

Receive Microsoft Knowledge Base articles by E-Mail?

Every night we scan the Microsoft Knowledge Base. If technologies you're interested in are updated, we'll send you an e-mail. You only get one e-mail a day, and only when new articles are added.

Click here to create a
FREE account
Already have an account?
[Click here to Login]

Search KbAlertz

Advanced Search

Webmasters
Put kbAlertz on your website.
[ Click Here for more! ]





ASP.NET 3.5 Web Hosting with Windows 2008 and SQL 2008: Click Here!
Discount ASP.NET Hosting
ASP.NET 2.0 and 3.5
Windows2008 and SQL2008
US and UK Hosting
The ad says 3 - but KBAlertz referrals get
** SIX MONTHS FREE **


Bug Tracking Software
For bug tracking software or defect tracking software or issue tracking software, visit Axosoft.


Community Site



We Send hundreds of thousands of emails using ASP.NET Email



Expert Web Design & Graphic Design
Design44.com

ASP.NET 3.5 Web Hosting with Windows 2008 and SQL 2008: Click Here!
Discount ASP.NET Hosting
ASP.NET 2.0 and 3.5
Windows2008 and SQL2008
US and UK Hosting
The ad says 3 - but KBAlertz referrals get
** SIX MONTHS FREE **




Mentioned In








Microsoft Knowledge Base Article

This article contents is Microsoft Copyrighted material.
©2005-©2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Trademarks




Article ID: 251136 - Last Review: February 12, 2007 - Revision: 2.2

PRB: Numeric Field Displays #Deleted with Oracle Linked Tables

This article was previously published under Q251136

On This Page

SYMPTOMS

#Deleted entries are seen when Oracle linked tables containing number datatypes are opened using either Access 97 SR2 or Access 2000. This behavior is seen with both Oracle 7.3.4 server as well as Oracle 8.0.5 server irrespective of the version of the MSORCL32.DLL file used to create the DSN.

CAUSE

In Oracle, the NUMBER datatype by default has a precision of 38; that is it, is equivalent to NUMBER(38). This precision is much greater than what the Microsoft Jet database engine 3x/4x can handle. Thus, in this scenario Jet has to perform lookups using data that it cannot handle. The error is seen because Jet cannot succeed in the lookup and it therefore assumes that the data it's trying to find has been deleted.

RESOLUTION

The only workaround for this problem is to create the table using numbers of lower precision than the Oracle default precision of 38. With Jet 4.x, a precision of 28 is allowed.

STATUS

This behavior is by design. Microsoft has confirmed this to a design limitation of the Jet database engine.

MORE INFORMATION

This problem is seen on account of the inability of Jet to handle the large precision of Oracle's NUMBER datatype. This is not a driver issue because no problem is encountered when using pass-through queries or any other non-Jet based ODBC application.

Steps to Reproduce Behavior

NOTE: Use SQL *PLUS to run the following SQL Statements.

  • Case 1: Problematic table creation
    Create table MyNumTest1 (col1 number not null primary key, col2 varchar(10));
    
    insert into MyNumTest1 values (1.234, 'MyTest');
    insert into MyNumTest1 values (10.234, 'MyTest');
    
    						
  • Case 2: Using workaround syntax
    Create table MyNumTest2 (col1 number(16,3) not null primary key, col2 varchar(10));
    
    insert into MyNumTest1 values (1.234, 'MyTest');
    insert into MyNumTest1 values (10.234, 'MyTest');
    
    						
Once this is done, create an ODBC DSN (preferably a SYSTEM DSN) using the Microsoft ODBC for Oracle (version 2.573.4202) driver to connect to the Oracle server on which the above mentioned tables were created. Link these tables from Access 97 SR2 and Access 2000 using this DSN. #Delete entries are seen when opening the table MyNumTest1. No such problems are encountered with the other table.

The table definition has to be changed to get around this limitation of Jet 3x/4x with numbers of large precisions.

APPLIES TO
  • Microsoft Access 2000 Standard Edition
  • Microsoft Access 97 Standard Edition
Keywords: 
kbdatabase kbjet kbnofix kboracle kbprb KB251136
       

Community Feedback System

Very often, it takes hours to solve a problem. Very often, you've looked high and low, and have tried a lot of solutions. When you finally found it, chances are, it was because someone else helped you. Here's your chance to give back. Use our community feedback tool to let others know what worked for you and what didn't.

Please also understand that the community feedback system is not warranted to be correct, it's simply a system that we've built to let people try and help each other. If something in a feedback response doesn't make sense to you, or you're not comfortable making changes that the feedback talks about (like registry edits), please consult a professional.

Thank you for using kbAlertz.com Feedback System.

-- Scott Cate

Be the first to leave feedback, to help others about this knowledge base article.

(Optional) Name

(Optional) Public URL Or Email

Comments
No HTML -- Text Only Please